Legal Opinion

National Exchange Bank of Chester v. Sklut

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 9, 1930PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClakksoN, J.

The defendants, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence, made motions for judgment as in ease of nonsuit. C. S., 567. The Forsyth County Court overruled the motions, and on appeal to the Superior Court the ruling of the Forsyth County Court was sustained, and in this we can see no error. We think the evidence sufficient to be submitted to the jury.

It is well settled that “Admissions by agents, made while doing acts within the scope of the agency, and relating to the business in hand, are admissible against the principal when such admissions may be deemed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Brimmer v. M. H. Brimmer & Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  2. Swindell v. . LathamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  3. Stephens v. John L. Roper Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Brittain v. Westall.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  5. Latham v. . FieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commercial Solvents, Inc. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Fanelty v. Rogers Jewelers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Edgecombe Bonded Warehouse Co. v. Security National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. R. R. v. . Lassiter Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Hill v. . Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API