Edgecombe Bonded Warehouse Co. v. Security National Bank
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
The court below, as evidenced by its charge, held, as .a matter of law, that the defendant had offered no evidence of any probative force which challenged or put at issue plaintiff’s right of xecovery. In ascertaining the correctness of this conclusion the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to defendant and it is •entitled to every reasonable intendment thereon and every reasonable inference therefrom, for it is the province of the jury to determine the weight and credibility of the testimony.
On this question the plaintiff contends that the form of the endorsement on the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Standard Steam Specialty Co. v. Corn Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
- County of MacOn v. ShoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Wilmingiton & Weldon Railroad v. KitchinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- O'Connor v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
- Norfolk Southern Railroad v. SmithermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
- Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Smith v. . KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Cab Co. v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.