Legal Opinion

Edgecombe Bonded Warehouse Co. v. Security National Bank

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1939PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The court below, as evidenced by its charge, held, as .a matter of law, that the defendant had offered no evidence of any probative force which challenged or put at issue plaintiff’s right of xecovery. In ascertaining the correctness of this conclusion the evidence must be considered in the light most favorable to defendant and it is •entitled to every reasonable intendment thereon and every reasonable inference therefrom, for it is the province of the jury to determine the weight and credibility of the testimony.

On this question the plaintiff contends that the form of the endorsement on the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Standard Steam Specialty Co. v. Corn Exchange BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. County of MacOn v. ShoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Wilmingiton & Weldon Railroad v. KitchinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. O'Connor v. ClarkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  5. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. SmithermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Zimmerman v. Hogg & Allen, Professional Ass'nSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Gresham State Bank v. O & K Construction Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Mayo v. American Fire & Casualty CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Smith v. . KappasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Cab Co. v. . Casualty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API