Legal Opinion

American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided November 5, 1948No. Civ. 40-166PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, Chief Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiff asking for a pre-trial conference. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 16, 28 U.S.C.A.

The action is for a declaratory judgment construing a contract. Plaintiff contends it may terminate its contract with defendant and remain in the fan business; defendant maintains that if the contract be terminated, plaintiff must refrain from doing business in fans. Judge Bright ruled the case was not a proper one for a declaratory judgment, D.C., 75 F.Supp. 421, but was unanimously reversed by the Court of Appeals, 2 Cir., 166 F.2d 535.

Defendant’s answer,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  2. American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
  3. Society of European Stage Authors & Composers, Inc. v. WCAU Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1947

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
  2. American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API