Legal Opinion
American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 12, 1947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRIGHT, District Judge.
Defendant moves pursuant to Rule 12(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c, to dismiss on the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, that the court lacks jurisdiction because there is no matter in controversy between the parties, nor any which is justiciable or which exceeds $3,000 in amount exclusive of interest and costs; or, in the alternative, to strike out a portion of paragraph 9 of the complaint, for a more definite statement with respect to portions of that paragraph, and for a bill of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Coffman v. Breeze Corporations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- American Mach. & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948
- American Machine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1948