Legal Opinion

American MacHine & Metals, Inc. v. De Bothezat Impeller Co.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 8, 1949No. 40-166PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNOX, Chief Judge.

In April, 1934, the litigants herein made a contract whereby the De Bothezat Company, defendant, assigned to plaintiff, Metals Corporation, certain letters patent and conveyed to it certain plant and equipment facilities. In addition, it leased other equipment to plaintiff. The purpose was that the latter should carry on a fan business in which defendant had previously engaged. In return, plaintiff promised to pay specified royalties to defendant. The tenth paragraph of the contract, in part, is as follows:

“One year after the date hereof or at any time thereafter, Metals…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Collins v. Metro-Goldwyn Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
  5. Swift & Co. v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Farmland Irrigation Co. v. DopplmaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v. Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1979
  3. Baskett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Buffington v. Continental Casualty CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Sheild v. WelchSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API