Legal Opinion
Loar v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 6, 2006No. 04CA2511PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVogt, J.
Petitioners, Thomas Loar and Donna Loar, appeal the trial court’s summary judgment in favor of respondent, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
Petitioners purchased an automobile policy from State Farm in 1998. The policy provided bodily injury liability coverage and uninsured-underinsured motorist (UM/UIM) coverage, both with limits of $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident.
In August 2000, petitioner Donna Loar was injured in an automobile accident while she was in the course and scope of her employment. After receiving workers’…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Terranova v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. ParfreySupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
- DeHerrera Ex Rel. DeHerrera v. Sentry Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2001
- Carlson v. FerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kaercher v. SaterColorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Pacheco v. Shelter Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Przekurat v. TorresColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Loar v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- Salazar v. Clancy Systems International, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006