Legal Opinion

Steele v. Denning

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided September 20, 1984No. 84-C-0576PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

456 So.2d 992 (1984)

James C. STEELE, III and Gloria Dyke Steele

v.

Eloise S. DENNING, et al.

No. 84-C-0576.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

September 20, 1984.

Harvey Perry, Monroe, for plaintiffs-applicants.

Daniel T. Murchison, Raymond Arthur, Watson, Murchison, Crews, Arthur & Corkern, Natchitoches, R. Wayne Smith, Ruston, for defendants-respondents.

CALOGERO, Justice.

The legal issue presented for our consideration in this case concerns whether a person who owns an undivided interest in land, without the attendant mineral rights (because the land is subject to a mineral servitude), has a right to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Frost-Johnson Lumber Co. v. Salling's HeirsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. ReeseSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  3. Smith v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. CarrollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
  5. Steele v. DenningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Frey v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Texaco Inc. v. Louisiana Land and Exploration Co.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1992
  3. Texaco v. Newton & Rosa Smith Charitable TrustLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
  4. Horton v. MobleyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. Amoco Production Co. v. ThompsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API