Legal Opinion
Nunno v. Wixner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 21, 2001No. SC 16392PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the provisions of General Statutes § 52-192a,2 *674concerning an offer of judgment by a plaintiff, apply to a judgment entered as a result of a mandatory arbitration proceeding pursuant to General Statutes § 52-549u.3 We conclude that they do not.
The following undisputed facts are relevant to this appeal. On December 10, 1997, the plaintiff, Sherry Nunno,4 was the operator of a motor vehicle that was involved in a collision with a motor vehicle operated by the defendant Walter Wixner II and owned by the defendant Walter Wixner…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- McDonald v. City of West BranchSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Dodd v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Latham & Associates, Inc. v. William Raveis Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- C. R. Klewin Northeast, LLC v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Preston v. O'RourkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. DelgadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Costantino v. SkolnickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Education Ass'n v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.