Legal Opinion

Whittier v. Atkinson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFeitz, J.

In support of his demurrer the defendant, Levi Atkinson, contends, (1) that he is not a proper party to the action for the reason that it appears he never was a member of the alleged partnership; (2) that there is a defect of parties defendant because two members of the partnership are alleged to be deceased and no representative of the estate of either is made a party to the action; (3) that the action is barred by the statute of limitations, sec. 330.19 (6), Stats.; and (4) that if it were not barred by the statute of limitations, the plaintiffs were guilty of laches which deprives them of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Wrightson v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Bussewitz v. Wisconsin Teachers' Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Wharf v. WharfIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Wellman v. NorthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. Spencer Co-operative Live Stock Shipping Ass'n v. SchultzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of MayerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. A C Storage Co. v. Madison Moving & Wrecking Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  3. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. of America v. American State BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Kania v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API