Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. American Near East & Black Sea Line, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1922PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

The answer alleges that it was agreed between Samuel Clark Williams and the defendants that the corporation appear as maker and the individual defendants as indorsers; that, in fact, no money was loaned to the corporation, but the loan was to the individual defendants, and that it was all pursuant to a plan to evade the usury statute, because the maker, being a corporation, would be unable, by reason of the statute, to avail itself of the defense of usury.

The law is that if there is notice of an intent to take usury the lender cannot evade the statute by disguising the borrower. Grannis v.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grannis v. . StevensNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. Schanz v. SotscheckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gelber v. Kugel's Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  2. Gangadean v. FLORI INVESTMENT COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. North River Mortgage Corp. v. 254 Sixth Ave. Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Silver v. Michelle Gardens, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API