Legal Opinion

Gangadean v. FLORI INVESTMENT COMPANY

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 19, 1970No. 1 CA-CIV 1072PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACOBSON, Judge.

In this appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County, defendants in a foreclosure action seek to establish that a loan made to a corporation was in fact made to them as individuals and is therefore usurious.

Plaintiff-appellee, Flori Investment Company brought suit against defendants-appellants, Deonarine W. Gangadean and Vishnudevi Gangadean, his wife, and Dewan’s Beauty Products Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation, to collect sums due under a promissory note in the sum of $100,000.00 and to foreclose a realty mortgage securing the same. Judgment was entered by the trial…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Holland v. GrossSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
  3. Gelber v. Kugel's Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
  4. Higgins v. GuerinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Modern Pioneers Insurance Company v. NandinArizona Supreme Court · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In The Matter Of Jules B. Leblanc, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
  2. Kadish v. PHX.-SCOTTS. SPORTS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  3. Concannon v. YewellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  4. Gangadean v. Flori Investment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Brinkley v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API