Gangadean v. FLORI INVESTMENT COMPANY
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
JACOBSON, Judge.
In this appeal from the Superior Court of Maricopa County, defendants in a foreclosure action seek to establish that a loan made to a corporation was in fact made to them as individuals and is therefore usurious.
Plaintiff-appellee, Flori Investment Company brought suit against defendants-appellants, Deonarine W. Gangadean and Vishnudevi Gangadean, his wife, and Dewan’s Beauty Products Co., Inc., an Arizona corporation, to collect sums due under a promissory note in the sum of $100,000.00 and to foreclose a realty mortgage securing the same. Judgment was entered by the trial…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Jenkins v. MoyseNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Holland v. GrossSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Gelber v. Kugel's Tavern, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Higgins v. GuerinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
- Modern Pioneers Insurance Company v. NandinArizona Supreme Court · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In The Matter Of Jules B. Leblanc, IiiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Kadish v. PHX.-SCOTTS. SPORTS COMPANYCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Concannon v. YewellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Gangadean v. Flori Investment CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Brinkley v. Chase Manhattan Mortgage & Realty TrustCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980