Legal Opinion

VanBooven v. Smull

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 11, 1997No. WD 51982PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Per curiam

This ease involves an action alleging fraud in the sale of residential real estate. William and Jill Smull, defendants, appeal from the trial court’s judgment entered in favor of Ron and Patricia VanBooven, plaintiffs, in the amount of $3,100.00. On appeal, the Smulls claim that the trial court erred in entering judgment in favor of the VanBoo-vens because (1) there was no evidence that the Smulls knew there was any material defect; (2) the VanBoovens failed to show that the undisclosed information was beyond their reasonable reach and not discoverable in the exercise of reasonable diligence;…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
  2. Marriage of T.B.G. v. C.A.G.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  3. Colgan v. Washington Realty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. PaineWebber, Inc. v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  5. Ringstreet Northcrest, Inc. v. BisanzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. moses.com Securities, Inc. v. Comprehensive Software Systems, Inc. William W. Simpson Southwest Securities, Inc. David Glatstein David ZeleniakCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  2. Craig Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Viacom Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Brizendine v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Independent Business Forms, Inc. v. A-M Graphics, Inc. A-M International Harris Graphics, a Division of A-M GraphicsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Counts v. General Motors, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API