Legal Opinion

Holcomb v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 2, 1986No. 123, September Term, 1985PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODOWSKY, Judge.

In this prosecution for murder the trial court admitted as a business record a contemporaneous memorandum, prepared by a police officer but not signed by the accused, which contained the accused’s oral confession. We granted certiorari primarily to decide whether the State was required to prove that the accused had acknowledged the accuracy of the document’s content. The State was not so required, as explained below.

On October 21, 1982, Tanea M. Rothschild, age 35, was found dead in her apartment in Baltimore County. She had been strangled and repeatedly stabbed. The next day…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. State v. FoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Aravanis v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Hall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960
  4. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. KuhlCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. State v. FolkesOregon Supreme Court · 1944

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Henry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  2. Ali v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. State v. VillarrealUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Graves v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1993
  5. Corbett v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API