Householder v. Kensington Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
McEWEN, Judge:
This appeal has been taken from an order sustaining preliminary objections in the nature of a demurrer and dismissing a complaint which sought damages for the allegedly wrongful discharge of appellant, an at-will employee. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in holding that, under the facts alleged, her sole avenue of recourse was to proceed pursuant to the provisions of the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (hereinafter “PHRA”), Act of October 27, 1955, P.L. 744, §§ 1 et seq., as amended, 43 P.S. §§ 951 et seq.
The standard of review which we apply when examining a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Reuther v. Fowler & Williams, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hoffman v. Misericordia HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Birl v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Yaindl v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. Standard Pump-Aldrich DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Weaver v. HarpsterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Rinehimer v. Luzerne County Community CollegeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Clay v. Advanced Computer Applications, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Jacques v. Akzo International Salt, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.