Legal Opinion

State v. Tucker

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 2011No. 84952-8PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

¶1 At issue is whether the State initiated a proceeding to revoke Natasha Tucker’s deferred disposition before the juvenile court’s jurisdiction over her expired. We grant Tucker’s petition for review and hold that the State failed to timely institute revocation proceedings.

¶2 Tucker was 14 years old when she threw a rock through a friend’s living room window while arguing over an iPod. The State charged her with residential burglary and malicious mischief. Tucker agreed to plead guilty, and she received a deferred disposition. The juvenile court ordered her to pay $2,630.40 in restitution as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  2. State v. ToddCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  3. State v. N.S.T.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  4. State v. NSTCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. D.D.-H.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  2. State v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. State Of Washington v. D.d-h.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. State v. J.O.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API