State v. D.D.-H.

[As amended by order of the Court of Appeals December 12, 2016.]

Cox, J.

¶1 D.D.-H. appeals the juvenile court’s order on revision, arguing that the court lacked jurisdiction beyond the originally scheduled expiration of his community supervision. Because he was on warrant status four times during that supervision, he was then outside the court’s jurisdiction. Thus, tolling applied and community supervision did not expire on the originally scheduled date *950of expiration. The juvenile court retained jurisdiction to modify the disposition order and impose sanctions during the additional tolled…