Union Assurance Society of London v. Nalls
Supreme Court of Virginia
Error to a judgment'of the Hustings Court of the city of Iioanoke, rendered January 29, 1902, in an action of assumpsit, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.
This is an action of assumpsit on a policy.issued by the plaintiff in error, insuring the machinery and stock in the canning factory of the defendant in error, situated in the city of Roanoke, against loss by fire, to the amount of $5,000.
The jury found á verdict for the plaintiff for $4,084.86, with interest. Whereupon the defendant moved the court to set aside the verdict, and for a new trial, upon the ground that the verdict was contrary to the law and the evidence, and that the court, by its instructions, had misdirected the jury as to the law. The motion was overruled, and judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Quarrier v. Peabody Insurance Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
- Mokotock Insurance v. Rodefer Bros.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1896
- West Rockingham Mutual Fire Ins. v. Sheets & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1875
- Manhattan Fire Ins. v. Weill & UllmanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
- Wooddy v. Old Dominion InsuranceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1879
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Virginia Fire & Marine Insurance v. Richmond Mica Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1904
- North River Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
- Westchester Fire Insurance v. Ocean View Pleasure Pier Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1907
- Petello v. Teutonia Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.