Legal Opinion

Virginia Fire & Marine Insurance v. Richmond Mica Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided February 10, 1904PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Error to a judgment of the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond, rendered in a proceeding by motion for a judgment, after notice in writing, wherein the defendant in error was the plaintiff, and the plaintiff in error was the defendant.

1Opinion of the CourtWhittle, J.

This was a proceeding by motion in the Circuit Court of the city of Richmond by the defendant in error, the Richmond Mica Company, against the plaintiff in error, the Virginia Eire & Marine Insurance Company, upon a fire insurance policy, to recover the sum of $1,500, loss occasioned the plaintiff from the destruction by fire of certain of the property covered by the policy.

The policy contains, among others, the following provisions:(1) “This entire policy, -unless otherwise provided by agreement indorsed hereon or added hereto, shall be void ... if the interest of the insured be other than…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Insurance Co. v. DutcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Farnum v. Phoenix InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Geo. Home Ins. v. Kinnier's adm'xSupreme Court of Virginia · 1877
  5. Lynchburg Fire Ins. v. WestSupreme Court of Virginia · 1882

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. MacKay v. Aetna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
  2. Corporation of the Royal Exchange Assurance v. FranklinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  3. Virginia Auto Mutual Insurance v. BrillhartSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  4. Gold Issue Mining & Milling Co. v. Pennsylvania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
  5. Eagle Fire Co. v. LewallenSupreme Court of Florida · 1908

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API