Legal Opinion

Smith v. Baum

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided July 15, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, C. J.

The claim in suit belonged to the plaintiff, and he and the defendant had the right to meet, compromise and adjust it, and so far as the plaintiff is concerned, the settlement is conclusive. . As to the plaintiff’s attorney, a *268different question arises. From, the commencement of an action the attorney has a lien upon his client’s cause of action, which attaches to a verdict, report, decision or judgment in his client’s favor, and the proceeds thereof, in whosesoever hand they come; and cannot he affected by any settlement between the parties before or after judgment (Code, sec. 66). The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eberhardt v. SchusterNew York Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Tullis v. BushnellNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1883
  3. Reimer v. DoergeNew York Marine Court · 1881

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Oliwill v. VerdenhalvenCity of New York Municipal Court · 1889
  2. Williams v. WilsonAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1896
  3. People ex rel. Reynolds v. Common CouncilSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1894
  4. People ex rel. Reynolds v. Common Council of BuffaloThe Superior Court of New York City · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API