Legal Opinion

Williams v. Wilson

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 15, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an affirmance by the General Term of the City Court of a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAdam, J.

The action is by the. plaintiff, a chorus singer, against the defendant, a theatrical manager, on a contract of employment, and is founded on an alleged wrongful discharge.

The plaintiff claimed that he was engaged for a season of thirty-five weeks, commencing September 10, 1894, while the defendant contended that the engagement was for an indefinite period, terminable on two weeks’notice.

■ The defendant, on October 1, 1894, served on the. plaintiff a written notice, stating that the former had availed himself of the usual two wéeks’ clause applicable to such engagements, and that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kirchner v. New Home Sewing MacHine Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Chapman v. . RoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Long v. . WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Eberhardt v. SchusterNew York Supreme Court · 1879
  5. McBratney v. Rome, Watertown & Ogdensburg RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Foster v. University Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rosenberg Suit & Coat Co. v. General Accident Fire & Life Assur. Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API