Legal Opinion

Hutchison v. Hill

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 2000No. 98-350PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

Randy and Mary Hutchinson and Jerry Yenne appeal from an order of the district court finding appellees Albert "Bud" and Ka-ry! Hill's intended use of their property is not in violation of the Restrictive Covenants on the Use of Land in Sunburst Estates Subdivision in Riverton, Wyoming, and denying appellants' request for a permanent injunction.

We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellants present the following issues:

ISSUE I: Did the trial court err as a matter of law in holding that appellees manufactured home did not fall within the definition of "trailer" as defined by the Sunburst Estates…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BommerWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cliff & Co., Ltd. v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Knadler v. AdamsWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  4. McLain v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Klutznick v. ThulinWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stevens v. ELK RUN HOMEOWNERS'ASS'N, INC.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Woods v. Wells Fargo Bank WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Granite Springs Retreat Ass'n v. ManningWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Vargas Ltd. Partnership v. Four "H" Ranches Architectural Control CommitteeWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Dwan v. Indian Springs Ranch Homeowners Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API