Legal Opinion

Klutznick v. Thulin

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 16, 1991No. 91-5PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDINE, Justice.

Appellant, Samuel J. Klutznick (Klutz-nick) sought to renovate a garage and workshop which was located on his property and to build a new garage. The appel-lees objected contending that Klutznick’s plans violated the restrictive covenants and an easement agreement. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of ap-pellees who were the neighbors of Klutz-nick.

We reverse.

ISSUES

Klutznick raises these issues:

“I. Did the District Court err in its interpretation of the instruments restricting the use of Appellant’s real property?
“II. Did the District Court err in its…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Four Nines Gold, Inc. v. 71 Const., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Wangler v. FedererWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Kerper v. KerperWyoming Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Snyder v. LovercheckWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Doctors' Co. v. Insurance Corp. of AmericaWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Moncrief v. Louisiana Land & Exploration Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Goglio v. Star Valley Ranch Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API