Legal Opinion

Pyroil Sales Co. v. Pep Boys

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1936No. L. A. No. 14954PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

By stipulation of counsel and order of court, the above-entitled cause was ordered submitted, and to be decided concurrently with Max Factor & Co. et al. v. Kunsman, L. A. No. 14662 (ante, p. 446 [55 Pac. (2d) 177]), decision in which cause has been this day filed.

The appeal here, as in the Factor case, is by the plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered after demurrer to the complaint sustained without leave to amend. Although not as extensive in its allegations as the complaint in the Factor case, the complaint is sufficient to raise the same general question of the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Weco Products Co. v. Reed Drug Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack of California, Inc. v. Pyroil Sales Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  4. Sears v. Western Thrift Stores of Olympia, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Taylor v. HawkinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API