Pep Boys, Manny, Moe & Jack of California, Inc. v. Pyroil Sales Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sutherland
These appeals involve the question of the constitutionality of §§ 1 and 1% of the California Fair Trade Act, as amended, Cal. Stat. 1931, p. 583, Cal. Stat. 1933, p. 793; Deering’s Gen. Laws of California, 1931, vol. 3, Act 8782, printed in the margin. * It will be seen upon comparison that they are substantially identical with §§ 1 and 2 of the Illinois act, which we have just sustained in Old Dearborn Distributing Co. v. Seagram-Distillers Corp., ante p. 183.
In the present cases suits were brought by appellees against appellants to enjoin the latter from alleged violations of § iy2. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Max Factor & Co. v. KunsmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Pyroil Sales Co. v. Pep BoysCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
3Cited by49 opinions
- Wholesale Tobacco Dealers Bureau of Southern California, Inc. v. National Candy & Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
- State Board of Dry Cleaners v. Thrift-D-Lux Cleaners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1953
- State v. LangleyWyoming Supreme Court · 1938
- Goldsmith v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Lilly Co. v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.