Legal Opinion

Swithenbank v. Wood

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 7, 1929No. Docket No. 3741PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action for the partition of personal property. The defendants Charles W. Wood and Lena Wood have appealed, on the judgment-roll alone, from the parts of the interlocutory decree which award the plaintiff the increase of certain sheep and lambs "from and after August 26, 1926," and the wool therefrom during the same period, and also the increase of other livestock from and after July 16, 1926. The court found the following facts:

April 16, 1921, Mary Jane Swithenbank and others leased the Swithenbank ranch, together with the livestock and other personal property thereon, to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Philbrook v. RandallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Collins v. RamishCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Cowell v. SnyderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Ashton Realty Co. v. ProwellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  5. Platner v. VincentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. 65282 Two Bunch Palms Building LLC v. Coastal Harvest II, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
  3. Hamilton v. RockMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Miller v. StultsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Pacho Limited Partnership v. Eureka Energy Co.California Court of Appeal · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API