Legal Opinion

State v. Stockton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 23, 1998No. 39739-7-IPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

— Matthew Stockton appeals his conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm, arguing the trial court improperly permitted the prosecutor to question him about unrelated drug use. The State cross-appeals, contending the trial court erred by instructing the jury on Stockton’s necessity defense. Because Stockton’s prior drug use was inadmissible and the testimony unduly prejudiced the necessity defense on which the trial court properly instructed the jury, we reverse his conviction.

FACTS

On June 23, 1996, Gary Pounds looked out the window of his Everett apartment and saw three people fighting…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. BennWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GefellerWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. State v. Avendano-LopezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  4. State v. JeffreyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995
  5. State v. TiganoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. JorgensonWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  3. State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  4. State v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. State v. HarstadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API