State v. Harstad
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 A jury convicted Ronald Harstad of molesting two of his son’s girl friend’s children, indecent exposure, *16and felony communication with a minor for immoral purposes. Because evidence that he touched the girls’ upper inner thighs while rubbing and moving his hand back and forth and breathing heavily sufficiently establishes contact with intimate parts for a sexual purpose and his other claims are without merit, we affirm his judgment and sentence.
Agid, J.
*16FACTS
¶2 B, Su, and Sh are sisters.1 Their father, Toby Johnson, was often absent because he was incarcerated.2 While Johnson was in prison…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. KirkmanWashington Supreme Court · 2007
- City of Spokane v. DouglassWashington Supreme Court · 1990
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Fernandez v. BennettDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- State Of Washington v. Alexander Paul Andrew KnightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
- State Of Washington v. Derek R. NebrejaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Dicky SwingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
- State Of Washington v. Jason D. StreiffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.