State v. Proctor
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MORRIS, Chief Judge.
The indictment charged defendant with trafficking in cocaine in violation of G.S. 90-95(h)(3). The defendant moved for a bill of particulars asking the State to identify more specifically the controlled substance involved. The State filed a bill of particulars stating that the substance was “cocaine which is a derivative of coca leaves.” Thereafter, the defendant moved to dismiss on grounds that “a derivative of coca leaves” is not included within the language of G.S. 90-95(h)(3) and, alternatively, on grounds that the statute is unconstitutionally vague as to whether “a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Matter of BanksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. . PartlowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
- State v. LocklearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Michael Leon BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- United States v. BrandonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2001