Legal Opinion

State v. Ray

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1930No. 6,712PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice ANGSTMaN

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny. His motion for a new trial was denied and he appealed from the judgment and order denying the motion. The sufficiency of the information is not challenged. It charged the larceny by defendant on July 2, 1928, of $216 belonging to the county of Judith Basin. The following is a brief summary of the evidence:

Defendant on July 2, 1928, was the county treasurer of Judith Basin county. On that day he issued a cheek in the sum of $216, payable to Frank C. Whittaker and signed “Yogo Lead and Zinc Co., By C. O. Ray.” The check was given in payment…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SlavskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. Ogilvie v. Aetna Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State v. StevensMontana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Hays v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. State v. ClarkIdaho Supreme Court · 1929

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Steel v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. State v. HuertaMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. AllisonMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In Re Kostohris' EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. McCollum v. O'NEILLMontana Supreme Court · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API