Legal Opinion

State v. Clark

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1929No. 5257PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGiyens, J.

Appellant was found guilty of having as city clerk of the city of Burley embezzled from such city the sum of $5,869.72 as charged in the information filed against him. His first group of assignments is based on the action of the trial court in allowing the state’s challenges of certain veniremen on the ground that they were qualified jurors and that the trial court improperly dismissed them.

A defendant is not entitled to any particular juror and even though these challenges should not have been allowed, defendant has not shown that the jurors actually chosen were not in every way qualified.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HoaglandIdaho Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Miller v. Village of MullanIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. EwertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. State v. DaweIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. WhitneyIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Boise City v. Better Homes, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State v. NeilIdaho Supreme Court · 1937
  5. State v. RedingIdaho Supreme Court · 1932

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API