Boehner v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, J.
The issue in this case is whether the provisions of RSA ch. 502-A which provide that cities and towns in which a district court is actually located must bear all expenses associated with the operation of the court, without financial support from other communities served by the court, are constitutional.
Procedurally, this appeal involves a number of petitions for declaratory judgment brought under RSA 491:22 V which were consolidated for hearing. Various city officials and taxpayers filed the petitions, challenging the legality of the district court funding scheme adopted by the legislature in…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Massachusetts Board of Retirement v. MurgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Carson v. MaurerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- LeClair v. LeClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
- In re Sandra H.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Appeal of BosselaitSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
- Cagan's, Inc. v. New Hampshire Department of Revenue AdministrationSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1985
- In re HamelSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1993
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.