Legal Opinion

United States v. Roland Bobby Redfield

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 17, 1968No. 12266_1PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Per curiam

Roland B. Redfield was convicted of obtaining marijuana without paying a transfer tax in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a) (1) while he was an inmate at Lorton Reformatory. The district court allowed a warden to testify that when Redfield was questioned at a prison disciplinary hearing he admitted ownership of the marijuana. In this appeal we do not pass upon the disciplinary board’s use of Redfield’s admission. Our inquiry is limited to the admissibility of the incriminating statement in Redfield’s criminal trial. Before he was questioned, Redfield was not cautioned of his right to be silent…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Mathis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. United States v. James L. ConleyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  2. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. State v. LaRueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  4. Shatzer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  5. Whitfield v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API