Whitfield v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtDigges, J.
Murphy, C. J., and Smith, J., concur in part and dissent in part. Murphy, C. J., filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part at page 144 infra, in which Smith, J., concurs.
We granted certiorari in this case to address what has been described as “probably the most difficult and frequently raised question in the wake of Miranda — what constitutes the ‘in custody interrogation’ or ‘custodial questioning’ which must be preceded by the Miranda warnings.” 1 Specifically, we are asked to decide: (1) whether, in the absence of Miranda admonitions, statements elicited from the…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Abeokuto v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- State v. WillisSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985
- Arthur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
- State v. RuckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Owens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.