Legal Opinion

Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 26, 1939No. 186PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

It will facilitate the discussion of the respective rights of the parties to this appeal to consider first whether the crosslibellant is entitled to recover from the cargo underwriters any balance due in General Average. It is argued that the shipowner should recover General Average contribution because of an agreement made on November 24, 1920, to settle all controversies by- a General Average adjustment. The agreement provided as follows :

“On fire and beached at Port of Spain, Trinidad. The cargo of coal has been badly wetted in extinguishing the fire, the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. The SouthwarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. United States v. WorleySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. International Navigation Co. v. Farr & Bailey Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  5. Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Sword Line, Inc., Libelant-Appellant v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. Asbestos Corp. Ltd. v. Compagnie De Navigation Fraissinet Et Cyprien FabreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  3. Hoskyn & Co. v. Silver Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Cross-Appellants v. M/v "Leslie Lykes", Etc., Lykes Bros. Steamship Co., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. The LouiseDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1945

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API