Legal Opinion
The Louise
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided January 16, 1945No. 2570PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHESNUT, District Judge.
The question now presented in this case is whether, under the particular facts, the cargo owners may recover prepaid freight, in view of the bill of lading provision that it was not to be returned “ship lost or not lost”, and though the voyage was frustrated. The question arises in this way:
This case in admiralty originated by the filing of libels by cargo owners, and seamen for wages, against the “Louise.” After hearing on the question of liability an interlocutory decree establishing it was entered in consequence of findings of fact and conclusions of law and opinion…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Steamship Willdomino v. Citro Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- The Malcolm Baxter, Jr.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- May v. Hamburg-Amerikanische Packetfahrt AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Allanwilde Transport Corp. v. Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hellenic Lines, Ltd., Cross-Appellee v. United States of America, and Commodity Credit Corporation, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Amoco Transport Co. v. S/S Mason LykesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Hamburg-American Line v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- In Re the Complaint of Delphinus Maritima, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Merchants Corp. of America v. Nine Thousand Six Hundred Fifty-five Long Tons, More or Less, of No. 2 Yellow MiloDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.