Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Allred

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 2000No. 98CR1564FE; CA A103666Published

1DissentBrewer, J.

I dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the sentencing court erred in its application of departure Factor J1 in sentencing defendant. In order to frame the discussion properly, I begin at a different point of analysis, namely, by clarifying what is not at issue in this appeal.

Defendant does not contend that the evidence in the record was inadequate to support the sentencing court’s findings of fact. Defendant was convicted of assisting a fugitive who was accused of committing aggravated murder with a shotgun and assault in the course of a home robbery. The fugitive admitted to defendant…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Stull v. HokeOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Stevens v. BisphamOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API