Legal Opinion

Kovar v. Habrock

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 2001No. S-99-1163PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.

The appellant, Dale G. Habrock, argues that the district court did not have jurisdiction to render a default judgment against him. At issue is whether, under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-217 (Reissue 1995), the action of the appellee, Vicki L. Kovar, was dismissed by operation of law because Habrock was not served with process within 6 months.

After experiencing difficulties serving Habrock personally, Kovar was granted leave under Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-517.02 (Reissue 1995) for alternate service. The order provided for service by publication and service on Habrock’s probation officer, but Kovar failed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Cao v. Huan NguyenNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Vopalka v. AbrahamNebraska Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State Ex Rel. Lamm v. Nebraska Board of PardonsNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Scottsdale Insurance v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wasikowski v. Nebraska Quality Jobs BoardNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. HalfordNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Fox v. NickNebraska Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Carrizales v. Creighton St. JosephNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Reid v. EvansNebraska Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API