Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Richards
District Court, D. Utah
Decided October 17, 2023No. 2:21-cv-00726Unknown
1Opinion
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF UTAH GREG ANDERSON, MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER DENYING [33] MOTION FOR A Plaintiff, NEW TRIAL PURSUANT TO RULE 60 v. Case No. 2:21-cv-00726-DBB JIM RICHARDS, in his individual capacity District Judge David Barlow and in his official capacity; and JOHN OR JANE DOE(S) 1–10, Defendants. Before the court is pro se Plaintiff Greg Anderson’s (“Mr. Anderson”) Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Rule 60.1 Mr. Anderson seeks a new trial on his claims against Defendant Jim Richards (“Mr. Richards”). For the following reasons, the court denies Mr.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Raymond J. Van Skiver Alma L. Van Skiver v. United States of America and John DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management Dist.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.