Legal Opinion

Sullivan MacH. Co. v. Griffith, Rec.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1928No. Appeal, 6PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

Plaintiff issued a writ of replevin in Somerset County against defendant, receiver of the Rowena Coal Company, to obtain possession of certain mining machinery sold by plaintiff to that company under a conditional sale agreement made prior to the Conditional Sales Act of May 12, 1925. On the trial the court gave binding instructions for defendant and thereafter entered judgment for plaintiff n. o. v.; the Superior Court on appeal reversed and granted a new trial. This is the action complained of by plaintiff.

The decree appointing the receiver was entered by the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. John Deere Plow Co. v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Shipler v. New Castle Paper Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  3. Jennings v. Supreme Photoplay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Allen v. Marshall, ReceiversSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. George J. Meyer Mfg. Co. v. SproulCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941
  2. In re Coover, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1932
  3. Keystone State Corp. v. Union Indemnity Corp., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1939
  4. Sullivan MacHinery Co. v. GriffithSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API