Legal Opinion

Allen v. Marshall, Receivers

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 25, 1928No. Appeal, 34PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Schaffer,

A declaratory judgment was entered against defendants from which they appeal.

The controversy is over a fund of $11,585.54, representing the proceeds of a tank of wax distillate claimed by plaintiff as belonging to him and by defendant receivers to be the property of their company.

There had been a course of dealings between plaintiff and the North Penn Refining Company in which the former shipped and charged to the latter wax distillate, which it refined, delivering to plaintiff a commodity called raw neutral produced from the distillate by the process of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. John Deere Plow Co. v. HersheySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  3. Shipler v. New Castle Paper Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  4. Bretz v. DiehlSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  5. Jennings v. Supreme Photoplay Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Consolid'd B. L. Assn. v. ShipleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Consolidated Building & Loan Ass'n v. ShipleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  3. Sullivan MacH. Co. v. Griffith, Rec.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API