Fig Garden Park No. 1 Homeowners Ass'n v. Assemi Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FRANSON, J. *
Introduction
This appeal presents the question: do certain grant deeds made subject to “[a]ll reservations, conditions and restrictions of record” adequately incorporate by reference a previously recorded “Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions” (CC&Rs) by which the grantors established a general plan for the development and use of a particular subdivision? The answer is yes, so that the restrictions contained in the CC&Rs constitute “mutual equitable servitudes.” We will affirm the judgment.
The Case
Respondents Fig Garden Park No. 1 Homeowners Association…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Sain v. SilvestreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Murry v. LovellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995