Legal Opinion

Fig Garden Park No. 1 Homeowners Ass'n v. Assemi Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 30, 1991No. F013609PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FRANSON, J. *

Introduction

This appeal presents the question: do certain grant deeds made subject to “[a]ll reservations, conditions and restrictions of record” adequately incorporate by reference a previously recorded “Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions” (CC&Rs) by which the grantors established a general plan for the development and use of a particular subdivision? The answer is yes, so that the restrictions contained in the CC&Rs constitute “mutual equitable servitudes.” We will affirm the judgment.

The Case

Respondents Fig Garden Park No. 1 Homeowners Association…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Sain v. SilvestreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Murry v. LovellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API