Murry v. Lovell
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtVan Dyke, P. J.
This is an appeal from a judgment against defendants which enjoined them as the owners of a lot in a subdivision from violating certain use restrictions which the trial court found to be binding upon them as owners of such lot. The suit was brought by the owners of the adjacent lot. Both plaintiffs and defendants claimed under a common grantor. The restrictions declared and enforced stated as to all lots in the subdivision, that: “No noxious or offensive trade or activity, shall be carried on upon any lot nor shall anything be done thereon which may be or become an annoyance or nuisance to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Werner v. GrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Wing v. Forest Lawn Cemetery Assn.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Gardner v. MaffittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Martin v. HolmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hill v. BernheimerNew York Supreme Court · 1912
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Riley v. Bear Creek Planning CommitteeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Federoff v. Pioneer Title & Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Seaton v. CliffordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Girard v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.