Legal Opinion

Mobilab Union, Inc. v. Johansen

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided January 21, 1985No. Civ. A. No. 84-3689PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GERRY, District Judge.

The plaintiff, Mobilab Union, has a collective bargaining relationship with the Mobil Research and Development Corporation (MRDC) and has had such a relationship for more than 25 years. In October 1983, the plaintiff and MRDC commenced negotiations for a collective bargaining agreement to succeed the contract due to expire on January 15, 1984. The negotiations did not prove to be fruitful, and on February 27, 1984, MRDC announced that it was making its “last and final offer.” This offer was rejected. On March 26, 1984, taking the position that bargaining had…

2Cases cited15 opinions

Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
Arnett v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers, Local 283 v. ScofieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
Walter Bachowski v. Peter Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor Andunited Steelworkers of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Holly Jarvis v. National Labor Relations Board, Office of Congressional and Public Affairs, Ruth Besantis, Desmond Metzger, and John DoeDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2026