Legal Opinion

Turman v. Burton Et Ux.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 11, 1913No. 2451PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from District Court, Ohmulgee County; W. L. Barnum, judge. Action by Charles Burton and Millie Burton against William S. Turman.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHABP, C.

Plaintiffs below, defendants in error, sued defendant below, plaintiff in error, to recover judgment in the sum of $1,164.25 and interest, an alleged balance due on the purchase price of certain lands situated in Okmulgee county. A jury trial being had, a verdict was returned in favor of plaintiffs.

The only errors upon which a reversal is sought arise out of an instruction given by the court, and the refusal to give an instruction requested by defendant. The case-made does not contain the evidence nor any part thereof; neither is there a statement of what the evidence was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. St. Paul Fire Marine Ins. Co. v. MittendorfSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. Shawnee Nat. Bank v. Wootten & PottsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Arthur v. CoyneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Town of Leroy v. McConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  5. Solomon Railroad v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owens v. Turman Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Livingston v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Winn v. CoreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Canafax v. Bank of Commerce of McLoudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  5. Miller v. Griffin Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API