Legal Opinion

Canafax v. Bank of Commerce of McLoud

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1919No. 9438PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from County Court, Lincoln County ; Ira E. Billingslea, Judge. Action by the Bank of Commerce of Mc-Loud, Okla., against W. F. Canafax. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This is an action of replevin, brought in the county couri of Lincoln county. After a general denial plaintiff in error pleaded, by way of counterclaim and cross-petition, the payment of , various sums of money, and alleging that such sums were paid as usurious interest. To such answer and cross-petition defendant in error tiled a reply, consisting of a general denial, and further pleading a written release from all claims, debts, or demands by reason of the transaction as alleged in plaintiff in error’s cross-petition. Judgment was had against plaintiff in error, and a motion for a new trial…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Dabney v. HathawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Town of Leroy v. McConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. McIntosh v. LeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1881
  4. Swales v. GrubbsIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Grant v. CreedSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Owens v. Turman Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Winn v. CoreySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  3. Vozbut v. PomputisMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  4. Flo-Bend, Inc. v. PullamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
  5. Miller v. Griffin Grocery Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API