Legal Opinion

Zad, LLC v. Bulk Petroleum Corp.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 25, 2012No. 2010-CA-000023-DGPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ACREE, Judge:

The issue before us is whether the district court properly entered a judgment of forcible detainer against Zad, LLC, thereby ordering Zad to vacate a gas station and convenience store which it had leased from Bulk Petroleum Corp. More specifically, Zad claims Title I of the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act (PMPA), 15 U.S.C. §§ 2801-2806, preempts state forcible detainer statutes, at least as applied to petroleum franchise agreements, and it was therefore improper for the district court to evict Zad under state law.2 We agree with Zad and reverse the district court’s order.

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Mac's Shell Service, Inc. v. Shell Oil Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Dersch Energies, Inc. v. Shell Oil Company and Equilon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Epsilon Trading Co. v. Revenue CabinetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
  5. Niehoff v. Surgidev Corp.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1997

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API