Legal Opinion

Niehoff v. Surgidev Corp.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1997No. 96-SC-0127-DGPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WINTERSHEIMER, Justice.

This appeal is from a decision of the Court of Appeals which affirmed a summary judgment by the circuit court determining that the claim for compensatory and punitive damages was properly dismissed because federal law preempted any claim for state tort relief.

The issue is whether the tort claim under Kentucky common law is in conflict with or divergence from any specific federal regulation applicable to the medical device which allegedly ultimately resulted in the loss of the patient’s eye.

Facts of this Case

The product involved in this appeal is the Style 10 intraocular…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Medtronic, Inc. v. LohrSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Baird v. American Medical OpticsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  2. Worthy v. Collagen Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Goodlin v. Medtronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. Lexington Fayette County Food & Beverage Ass'n v. Lexington-Fayette Urban County GovernmentKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Southard v. Temple University HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API