Legal Opinion

Grocers, Inc. v. Horstman

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 16, 1951No. 35,191PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thomas Gallagher, Justice.

Plaintiff, a Minnesota corporation, brings this action against defendant on his guarantee of a promissory note in the sum of $7,000. The note, dated December 5, 1947, is payable to plaintiff and was made by C. A. Hafslund and by M. J. Horstman, a nephew of defendant. It was delivered by the latter to plaintiff on December 7, 1947, as part of the purchase price on the sale by plaintiff to Hafslund and M. J. Horstman of a grocery and meat business known as the Stinson Food Market in Minneapolis.

Defendant admitted his execution of the note as endorser on *194December 5,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Clark v. WellsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  2. Chubbuck v. ClevelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  3. Triggs v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Albrecht v. RathaiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  5. McWethy v. NorbySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ward v. American Leg. Edw. B. Cutter Post 102, AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Ward v. American Leg. Edw. B. Cutter Post 102, AnokaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API