Karsh v. City and County of Denver
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Groves
In a declaratory judgment proceeding, the plaintiffs sought to have declared invalid an amendment to the charter of the City and County of Denver, which authorized the issuance of general obligation bonds. The trial court sustained a motion of the defendants for judgment on the pleadings, and dismissed the complaint. We affirm on the basis that the bond issue was validly authorized.
The charter amendment provided for the issuance in Denver’s name and behalf of not to exceed $6,000,000 in bonds. The proceeds of the bond issue are to be used to defray in part Denver’s share of the cost of a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Cipriano v. City of HoumaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- City of Phoenix v. KolodziejskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McNichols v. City of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Rinn v. BedfordSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938
- Berman v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. ByrneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
- City & County of Denver Ex Rel. Board of Water Commissioners v. Colorado River Water Conservation DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- Town of Telluride v. San Miguel Valley Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Martinez v. Colorado Department of Human ServicesColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Hess v. HobartColorado Court of Appeals · 2020
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.