Legal Opinion

Simenstad v. Hagen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDieterich, J.

The record reveals the following facts. On November 14, 1947, the parties were all directors of the Bank of Osceola, and owned the following number of shares of the bank’s stock:

Lien O. Simenstad.................. 28 shares

Iver M. Hagen.....................48 shares

B. J. Zimmerman...................51 shares

Eugene L. Beyl.................... 32 shares.

There were 600 shares of capital stock then outstanding, 301 of which were owned by the Segregated Trust of the Bank of Osceola. On the aforementioned date, the parties entered into a written contract which contained the following provisions:

“Whe…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lakeside Oil Co. v. SlutskyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Timme v. KopmeierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Kline v. Little Rapids Pulp Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Butterick Publishing Co. v. RoseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Koelbel v. TecktoniusWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Company v. Ronald Pribyl, James Harvey, Thomas Skrtic, and Accu-Tech Plastics, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  2. Yusuf v. Hamed ex rel. HamedSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
  3. Baierl v. McTaggartWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. David J. Rosecky v. Monica M. SchisselWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Schara v. ThiedeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API